Thou Shalt not Trample on the Constitution :: essays research papers fc

Thou Shalt not Trample on the Constitution. Congress shall start out no fair play respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise hence or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press or the right of the community peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. This is the first amendment to the Constitution. In essence this states that the government will not be throw in involved or sponsor any religion. There is a reason our founding fathers added this amendment to the Constitution. both snip a government becomes involved with religion or indorse versa, Disaster happens. If you want evidence of this look at the history of europium for the past 700 years and see what chaos has arisen when religion and the state intertwine. save we do not seem to be learning from the past. Congress on June 17, 1999, passed a law that slaps the First Amendment in the face. That law allowed for the states to choose to extend th e Ten Commandments in public schools and other government buildings. The law that was proposed by Rep. Bob Barr (R-GA), Rep. Robert Alderholt (R-Al), and Rep. Henry Hyde (R-IL). The bill was created in response to the Columbine shootings that took piazza April 20, 1999. The bill was swept through the house at a time when the country was in shock over the shootings. There were several reasons why the house felt the need to pass such a bill. Rep. Alderhold believed that it is an beta step to promote morality, and an end of children killing children. (Leavitt) Rep. Hyde believes that the amendment should slow the flood of harmful waste into the minds of our children. (Webster) Rep. Barr went as far to say that if Columbine had the Ten Commandments post that the massacre of April 20th would not have occurred.(Webster) These are the arguments for the Ten Commandments to be posted in public schools. These are the best reasons our elected representatives could come up with to slap the F irst Amendment in the face. Is it really as Rep. Alderholt tell We have the freedom of religion, not freedom from religion? (Leavitt) According to the ultimate Court The honorable Alderholt is wrong. In 1980 the Supreme Court ruled that a similar Kentucky law, which required all classrooms to post a copy of the Decalogue, was unconstitutional. The oppositions arguments against this law are enormous.