Is Tiger That Great? :: essays research papers

There has been a vast amount of media exposure on tiger timber. The media made Tiger Woods out to be some sort of golf matinee idol that nobody could evade and he was tot onlyy reshaping the way the game was played. We did not believe that that Tiger Woods was really as good as the media said he was. First off, we went to http//www.pgatour.com and http//www.tigerwoods.com to collect our information. We embed the average gain ground of the top 100 PGA tour players. We raise that Tiger Woods was in truth ranked in second place, one spot behind the advance average leader, David Duval. However, there are currently somewhere in the similarity of 400 players playing the PGA turning. It&8217s not too bad to beat 398 of them As a second to this incredible piece of information, came Woods&8217 memoir and career statistics. Astounding considering his short professional career. All of these observations combined with our birth calculations have changed our earlier mentioned view. A fter hours of research and study we have demonstrate Woods to be a swell player. This change of heart conduct to our hypothesis Even without the media hype Tiger Woods has proved himself, statistically, to be a great player. This hypothesis is backed by a great deal of statistical information and factual, proven input through our induce calculations. After finding our data online it was already clearly evident that Woods&8217 was a good player, but we wondered how much better he would wait after the math was done. We hope some of the following numbers be active you as much as they did us. The mean scrape of a PGA Tour Top 100 player is currently 70.63. Woods&8217 mean score is a dazzling 69.21. The total number of observations in our experiment was 104, because of true PGA Tour ties within the averages. Our standard deviation, which is the measure of the spread of a distribution, was found to be .52 for the Top 100 scores. The inner quartile range (middle 50%) of the data is .81. This is the difference between quartile 3 and quartile 1, which are 71.06 and 70.25 respectively. The median, or middle of all 100 scores was 70.8, with a minimum score of 69.13 (1 David Duval), and a maximum of 71.24 (100 Lee Rinker). To return to the basis of our project we found Woods&8217 standardized z-statistic, or how many standard deviations from the mean he lies, to be a &82112.