A Critical Analysis Of the Doctor Wont See You Now :: essays research papers

A Critical Analysis of "The Doctor Wont See You Now"Initially, throng Gorman appears to be stating that physicians should not beethically obligated to treat each and every "slob" that seeks treatment. Thetitle of the essay, and the sarcastic tone, give evidence that the thesis isquite the contrary. Gorman does identify an alarming trend of physicians lookingthrough a cynical eye with an example of a survey by the American MedicalAssociation, published November, 1991. " Thirty percent of doctors surveyedsaid they felt no ethical responsibilities to treat AIDS patients" (page 62).This seems to set the tone of disgust for much(prenominal) physicians. Gorman furthercondemns such physicians by reminding the reader "doctoring is a trade, a occupation requiring commitment and integrity" (page 63).Gorman confirms his argument with the first of many disenchanted views. devising a comparison that " old people who are on their charge out anyway" (pag e62) are responsible for rising health safekeeping costs.Gorman then becomes almost offensive when he offers some AIDS patients merit their predicament and others dont. At this point, the reader sees thatGorman is being very sarcastic and blistery towards physicians who mare sharethis view.In paragraph three, Gorman attempts to sack an analogy betwixt otherprofessions and related obligations. In essence, the analogy equates the amountof money and personal taste one whitethorn have, with the level of care and/or precaution one deserves. The analogy appears to be very inappropriate at first,however, this may be exactly what Gorman is trying to point out, making thereader more(prenominal) sympathetic to the thesis.Gorman begins to touch on a sound idea of snag medicine in paragraphfour, page 62, where he writes "... the medical profession is finally beginningto see that patients have a responsibility for their avouch health". Thecredibility of the previous statement is destroyed when Gorman goes on to make afalse analogy, comparing doctors with small business, and suggests that theiris no difference between the two fields. Gorman suggest that, like in smallbusiness, doctors should eliminate the " rabble" in their establishments.Unfortunately, the definition of riffraff is never revealed.Gorman goes on further to suggest which diseases or ailments should not betreated without any reason demur personal bias. The sarcastic tone is turnedup a ding on the proverbial dial from ten to eleven. Making a headlonggeneralization would usually destroy credibility on an issue, but utilize with thetone and thesis of this essay, it actually supports Gormans point.Gorman specifies carpal tunnel syndrome as a deserved ailment. In the last